Grader-1
- Overall, students did very well with the modified assignment criteria.
This allowed groups to explore their primary and secondary system a little bit
more than in past years. This helped to minimize overlapping among groups.
- Don't forget to address the concept of a system, as defined in week 1,
within your assignment. This was listed in the grading criteria, but several
groups failed to make reference to this.
- Be sure to back up claims about the limitations of systems with
some numerical evidence. For example, what is a typical
building footprint (square footage) or climate (temperature, RH, etc.) for this
type of system? This will make your claim sound more convincing and that it is
indeed a limitation.
- Be sure to complete the extra credit section. This is an easy way to make
up for lost points.
Grader-2
- As we have progressed through this course, the assignments have become more
open ended in regards to the deliverables. A good way to approach these
assignments, I've found, is to practice them as if they were engineering
communications you would make to somebody that is unfamiliar to the discipline.
How would you present this information so that it is clear to understand? What
information do you think is the most relevant and important to show?
- In regards to group work, remember that your teams rely on you to be timely
and prompt with your response so that the project can move forward.
Communication is very important in engineering whether it be technical writing
or correspondence. Please remember that these final two assignments are weighted
more than the past assignments, especially the last one. Be sure to give
yourself and your team ample time to complete A7. Good luck everyone!
One group had a teamwork problem. Generally, however, most groups are functioning well. Congratulations.
No comments:
Post a Comment